File:Hutton Unconformity , Jedburgh.jpg

An unconformity is a buried erosional or non-depositional surface separating two rock masses or strata of different ages, indicating that sediment deposition was not continuous. In general, the older layer was exposed to erosion for an interval of time before deposition of the younger, but the term is used to describe any break in the sedimentary geologic record. The significance of angular unconformity (see below) was shown by James Hutton, who found examples of Hutton's Unconformity at Jedburgh in 1787 and at Siccar Point in 1788.[1][2]

The rocks above an unconformity are younger than the rocks beneath (unless the sequence has been overturned). An unconformity represents time during which no sediments were preserved in a region. The local record for that time interval is missing and geologists must use other clues to discover that part of the geologic history of that area. The interval of geologic time not represented is called a hiatus.

Types of unconformitiesEdit



A disconformity is an unconformity between parallel layers of sedimentary rocks which represents a period of erosion or non-deposition.[3] Disconformities are marked by features of subaerial erosion. This type of erosion can leave channels and paleosols in the rock record.[4] A paraconformity is a type of disconformity in which the separation is a simple bedding plane with no obvious buried erosional surface.[5] A blended unconformity is a type of disconformity or nonconformity with no distinct separation plane or contact, sometimes consisting of soils, paleosols, or beds of pebbles derived from the underlying rock.



A nonconformity exists between sedimentary rocks and metamorphic or igneous rocks when the sedimentary rock lies above and was deposited on the pre-existing and eroded metamorphic or igneous rock. Namely, if the rock below the break is igneous or has lost its bedding by metamorphism, the plane of juncture is a nonconformity.[6]

Angular unconformityEdit

File:Angular unconformity.jpg
An angular unconformity is an unconformity where horizontally parallel strata of sedimentary rock are deposited on tilted and eroded layers, producing an angular discordance with the overlying horizontal layers. The whole sequence may later be deformed and tilted by further orogenic activity. A typical case history is presented by the paleotectonic evolution of the Briançonnais realm (Swiss and French Prealps) during the Jurassic (Septfontaine, 1984, 1995).
File:Briançonnais modèles 7F.jpg
File:Discordances successives Jurassique Préalpes.jpg

Paraconformity Edit


A paraconformity is a type of unconformity in which strata are parallel; there is little apparent erosion and the unconformity surface resembles a simple bedding plane. It is also called nondepositional unconformity or pseudoconformity.

Buttress unconformity Edit

A buttress unconformity is when younger bedding is deposited against older strata thus influencing its bedding structure. Template:Clear

Gallery Edit

See also Edit


Template:Commons category

  1. Hutton's Unconformity
  2. Keith Montgomery (2003). "Siccar Point and Teaching the History of Geology" (pdf). University of Wisconsin. Retrieved 2008-03-26. 
  3. Monroe J.S., Wicander R. & Hazlett R.W. (2007). Physical geology: exploring the Earth. Cengage Learning. pp. 267. ISBN 9780495011484 ISBN 9780495011484. 
  4. Disconformity at EPGeology
  5. American Geological Institute. Dictionary of Geological Terms. New York: Dolphin Books, 1962.
  6. Stokes, W. Lee (1982). Essentials of Earth History 4th Edition. Prentice Hall,Inc.. p. 65. ISBN 0-13-285890-8 ISBN 0-13-285890-8. 
  7. Cliff Ford (2 September, 2003). "Siccar Point". Field Excursion Preview. University of Edinburgh School of GeoSciences. Retrieved 2008-10-20. 

• Septfontaine M. (1984): Le Dogger des Préalpes médianes suisses et françaises - stratigraphie, évolution paléogéographique et paléotectonique.- Mém. Soc. Helv. Sci. Nat., vol. 97, 121 p. (Birkhäuser éd.)

• Septfontaine M. (1995): Large scale progressive unconformities in Jurassic strata of the Prealps South of lake Geneva: interpretation as synsedimentary inversion structures. Paleotectonic implications.- Eclogae geol. Helv., 88/3, 553-576.